data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8098/e8098cb87cfcb80953ba2ef58e2f4b1330405cf7" alt="About Us"
Towards a Renewable and Sustainable Energy Future
Renewable Energies Working Together
8.2.04
Pierre Fortin, Executive Director, Canadian Hydropower
Association (CHA)
Rob
McMonagle, Executive Director, Canadian Solar Industries
Association (CanSIA)
Robert
Hornung, President, Canadian Wind Energy Association
How can the world meet its 21st century energy needs
while protecting the environment? This is the task
before us, and only with affordable and environmentally
sound energy can we maintain our quality of life and
develop our economies.
This can be achieved with the implementation of
energy efficiency and conservation measures, and also
the sustainable development of clean and renewable
energy sources such as solar power, wind energy, and
hydropower.
But to achieve the transition from a largely fossil-fuel
based world energy mix to a more sustainable and renewable
energy scenario, we must have a comprehensive long-term
renewable energy strategy. Such a strategy would take
into account economic, social and environmental aspects,
would look at energy needs and available potential
at national and regional levels, and would build on
the potential synergies of different energy sources.
For example, a comprehensive energy strategy would
consider the following. As the production of electricity
from intermittent sources of green power increases,
the need for complementary energy storage systems
will also increase. This we know. We also know that
in countries like Germany and Denmark, wind power
is complemented primarily by baseload production of
fossil-fuel generated electricity. Given the environmental
degradation caused by the burning of fossil fuels,
we neither want nor need this solution for Canada.
Because hydropower is low emitting, clean, and renewable,
as well as uniquely flexible, it is the best source
to support the development of renewables such as wind
and solar.
With renewable energies working together, what might
a sustainable energy future look like? In Canada today,
hydropower supplies close to 60 percent of current
electricity production, and wind and solar less than
1 percent -- but the potential for development is
enormous. We estimate the technical potential of wind
power to be approximately 50,000 MW, solar power 70,000
MW, and hydropower 118,000 MW. I think we need to
rethink these potential numbers. Wind has much more
than 50,000 MW of potential…..we say 50,000
because the much larger number has not been quantified
and 50,000 represents about 20% of electricity supply
– a level we feel an intermittent source can
easily meet without imposing huge costs on the system.
I would suggest that solar, as another intermittent
source, needs to consider a similar constraint.
A Renewable Energy Strategy
Sustainable development, whether local or global,
demands an increase in the use of all renewable energies.
While it is important to set targets for the development
of renewables such as wind and solar, it is equally
important to recognize that hydropower, be it large
or small, run-of-river or storage, is a renewable
energy source. .
Canada needs to develop a formal comprehensive strategy
for the future development of all renewables, addressing
their needs and including appropriate incentives for
each renewable source of energy.
For example, some renewable energy technologies
require additional investment for more research and
development before they can be commercialized. Others
have been on the market for decades but are currently
facing difficulties at remaining competitive due to
the rising cost of environmental impact assessment
requirements and very high capital costs.
A national renewable energy strategy would require
all energy technologies to be evaluated on a life-cycle
basis, for a better accounting of their positive and
negative environmental aspects. This national strategy
would also build on the synergies of renewables by
including in assessments an analysis of the complementary
nature of renewables. Moreover, affordability would
be redefined: the hidden health, environmental and
social costs of fossil-fuel based energy should be
reflected in the market price.
New assessment criteria, new energy technologies,
new synergies, new environmental issues, all of this
calls for a central coordinating mechanism within
government devoted to the development and deployment
of renewable electricity sources. Such a mechanism
can ensure that all renewable energy sources receive
appropriate federal government support and incentives
to pursue healthy development.
The development of renewable energies would not
only reduce our dependence on fossil fuels, leading
to fewer greenhouse gas emissions, making for cleaner
air, and energy price stability, but it would also
generate new jobs in a wide range of sectors such
as research, manufacturing, and installation. In this
way, Canada could continue its tradition of being
a world leader in energy expertise. To reach this
future, renewable energies, with good governance,
must continue working together. So we will.
Readers Comments
Date |
Comment |
Len Gould
8.2.04 |
"the hidden health, environmental and social
costs of fossil-fuel based energy should be
reflected in the market price."
Well, you certainly got that much right. Otherwise
IMHO, a {too typically} high level discussion
with no specifics with with to agree or disagree.
Sure, we all like apple pie, are you offering
some or what?
e.g. what percentage of Cdn Hydro gen is at
present "run-of-river" with no storage facility
(Niagra)? Has anyone studied what (volume of
storage/storage time) is required to make a
megawatt of wind gen reliable? Does it need
to backup 90% for 2 weeks? Is it wort that?
Some specifics would help.
|
Stephen Heins
8.2.04 |
If "The Graduate" were being filmed today,
Ben would hear the following advice from me:
"Economics! "
Without it, we are stuck repeating past economic
mistakes, not unlike we did with the electric
car and solar house heating systems.
Ultimately, consumers and especially business
customers will pay for goods and services that
make sense with a real ROI. Otherwise, they
are properly skeptical of anything undefined,
unproven and uneconomic. Like any precious resource,
money matters and should not be wasted, even
for the best of causes
|
**** ****
8.10.04 |
If hydro generation is going to be the source
of electricity when the wind isn't blowing,
and the sun isn't shining, then it will be sufficient
to meet the systems full load. Why would you
bother developing wind and solar, which are
respectively approxiamately 5 and 10 times more
expensive then hydraulic?
If you need wind and solar because there isn't
sufficient hydraulic capacity to meet system
needs, then you need nuclear (assuming we forgo
the evils of petro based generation) when the
wind and solar don't meet the sytems needs.
Since nuclear is designed for base load requirements,
not for cycling up and down, and since it is
(based on current demonstrated construction
costs around the world) 1/3 to 1/5 the cost
of wind and solar respectively, again why bother
with wind and solar?
Nothing wrong with the government funding
demonstration projects and supporting research,
but to suggest that wind and solar can meet
more than 50% of our energy needs is disingenuous,
to say the least. Technically feasible, maybe.
Economically feasible, not even close.
|
David Katz
8.10.04 |
The above three repsonses show the wide divergent
views about energy and the environmental and
economic impacts. It is about economics, but
energy is also an essential service and must
be supplied and used wisely. Claims about the
renewable nature of large Hydro projects given
the GHG impacts, low nuclear cost estimates
given the Candu cost overuns, and renewable
technologies that are intermittent show the
compexity of a Demand/Supply SYSTEM. Hopefully
we will all recognize the need for Integrated
Resource Management and Planning so that all
issues of HEALTH, ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT can be
part of our ENERGY agenda. Saving energy may
still cost less than many of the supply options
if all the life cycle cost consdierations are
taken into account.
|
a b
8.10.04 |
Spanish Island
Aims for Energy Self-Sufficiency Madrid, Spain
- June 22, 2004 In one of the first examples of
its kind, one of the Canary Island chain's smallest
islands could soon be powered entirely by a combination
of renewable energy systems. The Spanish utility
Endesa has embarked on a plan to build a hybrid
wind power, pumped-hydroelectric power plant on
the small island of El Hierro. The Spanish-owned
Canary Islands are located south-west of Spain
and north-west of Africa, directly in front of
the coast of Morocco. The El Hierro hydro-wind
project entails an estimated investment of Euro
24 million (US$29 million). Like many islands
ranging from this small island in the Canary's
to the big Island of Hawaii, a vast majority of
electrical needs are derived from imported sources
leading to price vulnerability and transportation
accidents with fossil fuels. In 2000, El Hierro,
with an area of approximately 278 km(2) and a
population of roughly 10,000 inhabitants, was
declared a "Biosphere Reserve" by Unesco for its
preservation of the island's environment and cultural
values. This gave rise to the El Hierro hydro-wind
project. The project entails the construction
of a 9.9 MW pumped hydro power station equipped
with three 3 MW Pelton turbines. It will operate
as follows: the hydro plant will be located between
two man-made reservoirs placed at different levels,
generating power through the hydro powered turbines,
leveraging the different levels between the upper
and lower reservoirs. The energy obtained from
the wind farm will be used to pump the water in
the opposite direction. The project also includes
a desalination plant, which will use water from
the man-made reservoirs both to fill them up initially
and for subsequent supply needs due to the evaporation
caused by wind and heat. The surplus drinking
water produced by the desalination plant will
be used for irrigation on the island. The project
has been presented to the European Commission,
where it attracted a great deal of interest due
to its innovative use of clean energy. Specifically,
a demonstration of the project was given to the
European Commission on Energy and the Environment.
Also, the project was presented last week at the
fourth European Conference on Sustainable Cities
held in Aalborg, Denmark. It was one of the five
European projects selected out of a total of 280.
|
a b
8.10.04 |
OSLO, Norway -
A windblown island off Norway is being used to
test ways of overcoming a big drawback of alternative
energy: How to store it. Such renewable energy
sources as wind, waves and solar power provide
a clean alternative to climate damaging fossil
fuels and potentially dangerous nuclear power.
But sometimes the wind dies, the sea calms, and
the sun doesn’t shine, leaving those who
depend on them for power facing a blackout unless
they have a backup supply. Oslo-based ***** on
Tuesday presented its project to test a combination
of technologies, wind power and hydrogen fuel,
to overcome that problem on the island of Utsira,
off Norway’s western coast. “It is
the first full scale project of this type in the
world,” said project manager Paal Otto Eide,
whose company is leading the $5.8 million effort.
'Real customers' using technology The company
built two 600-kilowatt wind turbines to use with
a hydrogen generator and a fuel cell in providing
all the electricity for 10 homes on Utsira, Norway’s
smallest municipality with just 240 residents.
“It is real customers who are going to cook...
and watch TV with this electricity this summer,”
said Joergen Rostrup, ****'s vice president for
new energy. When it’s windy, which is usual
in Utsira, about 11 miles from the mainland, the
two wind turbines will produce much more electricity
than needed by the 10 homes. The excess power
will be used to produce hydrogen fuel so that
at first a hydrogen combustion engine , to be
replaced afterwards by a fuel cell make electricity
at windless times. Some is also being sent to
the mainland. “What is important is to store
the excess energy,” said Eide. “Utsira
is a demonstration of what we could imagine as
a hydrogen community in the future.” Hydrogen,
one of the most common elements on earth, is seen
by many as a pollution-free fuel of the future,
and is a key part of projects around the world,
including tests of hydrogen powered cars. It can
be derived from such sources as natural gas or
methane, or can be made by electricity —
in this case from the wind turbines, in a process
known as electrolysis that splits water into hydrogen
and oxygen. Export idea abroad? The wind turbines
and the hydrogen engine are already producing
electricity on Utsira, 200 miles west of Oslo.
The full switch from the traditional power grid
is set for July 1 for the test, which will last
two or three years. Eide said many remote areas
around the world depend on costly and polluting
diesel generators for electricity, which could
make an alternative, such as the wind and hydrogen
supply, attractive. “We want to prove that
this is possible, not economically viable, but
technically possible,” said Eide. The Utsira
trial follows energy and metals group ****’s
earlier involvement in hydrogen projects for the
transport sector, including a filling station
on Iceland. ***** is a major oil and natural gas
producer, and like many energy companies is preparing
to also meet demand for alternative fuels. The
group was founded in 1905 to produce mineral fertilizers
by using electricity from its hydroelectric plant,
hence the **** part of its name. Norway, the world’s
third largest oil exporter, produces virtually
all its own electricity with hydroelectric plants.
Wind power has made big strides, especially in
Denmark and Germany, and is the fastest-growing
part of the European power industry due to government
measures to curb emissions of greenhouse gases
widely blamed for global warming.
|
a b
8.10.04 |
The Canary island
self reliant project costs 2400 euro/person, for
a totaly independent energy supply. There are
around 20 million people living on islands in
europe alone, and globally, the figure is above
200 million (2/3 of the USA).
So a combination of renewable enrgy IS a technically
and economically feasible solution for some
area's in the world, Mr ******.
The Utsira Island project is not economically
interessant right now ($500 000/house for electricity
supply). However, I would be interested to see
what fuel cell developments in the coming year
will produce in efficiency increases (around
65% now, twice the efficiency of fossil fuel
powergen plants) , while price reductions will
happen.
If you don't do it, you stay stuck with nuke
power and it's thousands of years of waste disposal
baby siting, costing a lot of money.......
|
**** ****
8.10.04 |
8/10/04 Septimus
vander Linden. Storage in any form with renewable
energy is the right direction, systems do not
have to be large, however bulk energy storage
50 MW to 1000's of MW's are possible. visit www.energystoragecouncil.org
--In the US Pumped Hydro has virtually stopped
due to environmental concerns. There is plenty
of scope in Canada for such systems. The Iowa
Wind Storage Project(ISEP) is one example of using
aquifer storage for air and Natural gas. This
project under study will accomodate 200MW of generation,
and serve as a Mid Merit plant. The economics
are there, so give our neighbors across our Northen
border a chance to explore the synergies between
Renewable Energy and Storage concepts.
|
Charles Hall
8.10.04 |
8/10/04 I like the concept of renewable energy
-- who doesn't? Islands are often in good wind
zones. For the rest of us windmills require
huge fossil fuel investments for backups or
large changes in hydro operations that environmentalists
(I am one) don't like. For me a big issue is
EROI or energy return on investment. I think
this is one reason that fossil fuels remain
financially attractive, they have very high
(even now) EROI compared to most renewables.
Will this ever change?
For those interested I Have an editorial in
June Journal of Energy Technology called:The
Myth of sustainable developmjent: Personal reflections
on energy, its relation to neoclassical economics,
and Stanbley Jevons.
Send mail address to chall@esf.edu if you
are interested in a copy.
Charles Hall
|
|