Clean energy is 'cost effective' 
                            
                            Nov 7, 2006 BBC News
                            
                            
                              
                               
                                |  |  China and India will be behind 
                                    higher future energy demand | 
                              
                            
                              Using 
                            cleaner and more efficient energy not only helps the 
                            environment but also makes economic sense, according 
                            to the International Energy Agency (IEA).  
                            However, nations are likely to 
                              stick to fossil fuels, leading to a "dirty, expensive 
                              and insecure future", the IEA's World Energy Outlook 
                              reported. 
                             Using renewable power and nuclear 
                              energy could help the shift from fossil fuels, the 
                              agency said. 
                             The greatest future demand for 
                              energy will stem from China and India.  
                              
                            'Cost-effective'  
                             
                             
                            
                             
                            
                             The World Energy Outlook, which 
                              looks at energy trends to 2030, says that the world 
                              faces two related energy threats. 
                             One is inadequate and insecure 
                              energy supplies at affordable prices, and the other 
                              is environmental damage stemming from over-consumption 
                              of energy. 
                             "The good news is that these [alternative] 
                              policies are very cost-effective," said IEA executive 
                              director Claude Mandil. 
                             "There are different upfront costs 
                              involved, but they are quickly outweighed by savings 
                              in fuel expenditure," he said. 
                             Each extra $1 invested in more 
                              efficient electrical equipment and appliances avoids 
                              more than $2 in power generation, transmission and 
                              distribution infrastructure, the report says. 
                             The argument that switching to 
                              cleaner, more sustainable energy makes economic 
                              sense is being increasingly voiced. 
                             The IEA report comes on the heels 
                              of the Stern report, commissioned by the UK government, 
                              which argued that extreme weather could shrink the 
                              global economy by 20%. 
                            Demand  
                             Based on the IEA's alternative 
                              model, the agency forecasts that energy demand could 
                              be cut by 10% by 2030 - an amount equivalent to 
                              China's current annual output. 
                             One upshot of this scenario would 
                              be a 16% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. 
                              
                              
                            
                              
                              
                                |    The IEA is promoting nuclear 
                                      energy as part of a 'cleaner' mix | 
                              
                            
                             
                            
                             But if nothing is done and energy 
                              demand continues, without underlying changes being 
                              made, primary energy demand would rise by 53% between 
                              2006 and 2030. 
                             The report identifies that underinvestment 
                              in new energy supply as a "real risk". 
                             About half of all investment required 
                              is in developing countries, but "it is far from 
                              certain that this investment will actually occur", 
                              the report said. 
                             By 2010, China will be the world's 
                              largest emitter of CO2, overtaking the US, the report 
                              predicts. 
                             Such an increase would "amplify 
                              the magnitude of global climate change". 
                             Other energy  
                             As part of the proposed solution, 
                              the IEA says nuclear power could play a major role 
                              in reducing the reliance on imported gas and mitigate 
                              the impact of CO2 emissions. 
                             "But financing the upfront investment 
                              cost may remain a challenge," stressed Mr Mandil. 
                              
                             In addition, biofuels could play 
                              a significant role in meeting future energy needs 
                              for road transport, helping to diversify energy 
                              and reduce emissions.  
                            conserve the environment.